Search
Tags
academics (6) adiaphora (6) affluence (7) America (17) American culture (9) Anglicanism (8) announcements (18) Aquinas (3) architecture (6) ascension (4) asceticism (3) atonement (10) Augustine (6) authority (10) Barth (5) Bible (3) bin Laden (3) Britain (4) Bruce McCormack (10) C.S. Lewis (3) Calvin (18) Calvinism (11) Calvinist International (3) capital punishment (3) capitalism (27) Cartwright (4) cathedrals (6) Catholics (4) Chalcedon (4) charity (9) Christ (4) Christendom (4) Christian liberty (13) Christmas (4) church (30) church unity (5) climate change (5) coercion (7) conservatives (3) consumerism (4) corporations (6) creation (18) creationism (5) Croall lectures (9) cross (8) Darryl Hart (6) debt (3) dissertation (19) distributism (3) divine law (10) documentary (3) Doug Wilson (3) ecclesiastical law (4) economics (14) Election 2012 (3) Elizabethan Church (6) empire (3) environment (4) eschatology (7) ethics (5) Eucharist (4) evangelical law (4) evolution (6) fear (5) Fermentations (3) films (5) finance (3) free market (12) freedom (8) Gnosticism (3) gospel (3) government (7) Hall and Burton (5) homosexuality (6) Hooker (36) Hooker's Christology (5) housekeeping (6) human law (3) hypostatic union (5) idolatry (5) incarnation (16) inequality (3) invisible church (3) Israel (4) Jesus (22) John Locke (3) John Schneider (9) judgment (4) just war (9) justice (13) labor (4) law (24) Lent (3) LEP (7) liberalism (3) links (3) liturgy (3) love (16) Luther (9) mammon (4) marketing (4) media (7) Melanchthon (7) Mercersburg (4) modernity (3) N.T. Wright (4) natural law (25) nature/grace (8) neo-Calvinism (3) NLTK (3) Obama (4) O'Donovan (13) Old Testament law (8) pacifism (3) Paul (8) penal substitution (5) Peter Escalante (4) Peter Leithart (10) politics (24) poverty (7) prayer (7) private property (22) private property series (6) Protestantism (15) puritans (15) reason (8) rebellion (3) redemption (4) Reformation (15) Reformed (8) Republicans (5) resurrection (7) retribution (3) revelation (3) Richard Bauckham (3) Romans (10) science (9) Scripture (17) secularity (4) Sermon on the Mount (4) social justice (8) social media (3) sola scriptura (8) state (27) Steven Wedgeworth (3) tax avoidance (4) taxes (12) Tea Party (4) technology (8) theft (4) theology (5) theology of culture (3) theonomy (5) Theopolis (3) Torah (3) tradition (5) travel (3) truth (4) Twitter (3) two cities (4) two kingdoms (26) VanDrunen (19) vengeance (3) Vermigli (3) Vindiciae (3) violence (6) visible church (5) vocation (3) war (12) wealth (10) weather (4) women's ordination (3)

Entries in bin Laden (3)

Sunday
May152011

Being Fussy Citizens

Byron Smith was kind enough to point me toward an excellent little article by Oliver O'Donovan on the whole bin Laden business.  O'Donovan voices quite lucidly and judiciously some of the inchoate concerns that I tried to articulate in the wake of the killing and subsequent storm of reactions, concluding with this fine paragraph:

Christian citizens need not expect, and should not pretend to, total certainty about the rights and wrongs of this or any other public act. It is no part of God’s plan for their holiness or for their service of the neighbor that they must be all-knowing about the morality of what others have done, even when it is done in the name of the political community. Christians can be useful citizens, though, by being rather fussy about the justifications and explanations offered by political actors for their consumption and approval. Faced with extraordinary actions, they may demand thorough and coherent explanations on morally serious and law-regarding grounds. For myself, I am left thinking that whatever good account there is to be given of why bin Laden was killed, it has yet to be fully made public.

 

You can also find, on the same site, a fine reflection by Deonna Neal on the other bundle of concerns I had been talking about--the problems with taking pleasure in the death of the wicked.

Tuesday
May032011

Reactions to the Assassination: An Attempt at Some Elucidations

(I posted a version of this on Facebook, as a follow-up to a flurry of discussion there yesterday; but here it is without all the links and references to comments from my Facebook interlocutors that I had interspersed.)

My initial reaction to the bin Laden news yesterday, justly perceived as somewhat flippant ("So we managed to assassinate an old man on dialysis sitting at home, along with a few of his family members. The Greatest Nation on Earth never ceases to impress me"), was, more than anything, an expression that I really just didn’t think this deserved the status of obsessive headline news and discussion, that we all ought to chill and get back to our daily lives.  However, I found myself quickly entangled in half-a-dozen threads of discussion about it, and attempting to field all manner of objections to my patriotism, sense of justice, and theological competence.  As everyone and their grandma has now weighed in on the news from their blog and/or Facebook/Twitter soapboxes, and as the discussion doesn’t appear likely to die down any time soon, I figured I might as well try to sort through the tangle a bit for those who, like me, feel that the discussion is in danger of degenerating into chaos.   

At first it appear that there are roughly three positions--(1) “MWUHAHAHA!  We killed him!  Rock on USA!”; (2) “Settle down, let’s rejoice in the execution of justice, but without undue pride, giddiness, or vindictiveness”; (3) “Um, shouldn’t we be like God and not rejoice in the death of a sinner, but wish rather that he should turn from his ways and live?”  (Most Christians I’ve seen in the discussion, for the record, seem to be happily in some version of (2), though there are certainly some who sound disturbingly like (1), and a few others, including myself, who have said something like (3).) However, on reflection, it appears to be a bit more complicated than that, and I’m realizing that it’s somewhat sterile to carry out the debate simply in terms of “Should we be happy or not?”  So I’m trying to parse out more carefully the issues at stake, and it seems that there are at least eight different points that are being made by various people who want to qualify in some way our exuberance.  

Click to read more ...

Monday
May022011

Bin Laden is Dead: The Speech Obama Could Have Given

Obama’s speech last night about the assassination of bin Laden offered, on the whole, much to be appreciated.  Certainly, it avoided the excessive martyrology and jingoistic Americanism that has characterized other Presidential speeches.  And certainly, it was far better than many of the lamentably vengeful and nationalistic sentiments that it seems to have called forth from so many citizens.  But, if I may be so bold, what would Jesus say?  What might Obama’s speech have looked like if he’d really had courage and conviction?  I can’t really claim to know the right answer to that.  But here, at any rate, is what I might have wished for: 

My fellow Americans, after ten years and a million lives lost, I can announce to you today the death of Osama bin Laden, the man our country has long pursued as its arch-enemy.  It is not my purpose here to rejoice in this death or any death, but rather to recall with sadness all the deaths on that September day and on the bloody trail we have since pursued.  For all the harm he has done us, we did not, for our part, wish death on bin Laden; even our enemies deserve our sympathy.  Vengeance should not be sweet; the path of vengeance is the road to perdition.  Today, our forces closed in on bin Laden with the intention of capturing him and bringing him to due justice*; unfortunately, he was killed in the resulting firefight, as were members of his family around us.  

 

Click to read more ...