Documentary Round-Up Pt. 2: Down with Wal-Mart and McDonalds!
Friday, June 17, 2011 at 6:45PM
The High Cost of Low Price 
Friday, June 17, 2011 at 6:45PM
The High Cost of Low Price 
Wednesday, September 29, 2010 at 12:45PM We are accustomed to hearing among conservatives 2 Thess. 3:10 cited as essentially the only Biblical passage relevant to economics: "If a man does not work, let him not eat." This is the problem with welfare or even with too much voluntary charity, we are told. Most people are poor because they are lazy, and we mustn't reinforce this laziness. There is nothing new under the sun, and so it turns out that this claim is not the result of the great discoveries of capitalism, but is an age-old excuse, which the Church Fathers had to deal with 1600 years ago. In a paper on property rights, John Medaille of the Distributist Review quotes this passage from Chrysostom's Homilies on Hebrews:
"For why does he not work (you say)? And why is he to be maintained in idleness? But (tell me) is it by working that thou hast what thou hast, didst thou not receive it as an inheritance from thy fathers? And even if thou dost work, is this a reason why thou shouldest reproach another? Hearest thou not what Paul saith? For after saying, “He that worketh not, neither let him eat” (2 Thess. iii. 10), he says, “But ye be not weary in well doing.” (2 Thess. Iii. 13.)...Are all poor through idleness? Is no one so from shipwreck? None from lawsuits? None from being robbed? None from dangers? None from illness? None from any other difficulties?"
Saturday, September 18, 2010 at 1:48PM Now that we have outlined the general motivations for human action, how do these function in different spheres of human life? (I will not, of course, be comprehensive here and try to cover the entire scope of human life!)
In most people’s conception, and certainly in the “Christian libertarian” (for lack of a better term) conception, the religious sphere is governed primarily by the love motivation, the economic sphere is governed primarily by the reward motivation, and the political sphere is governed primarily by the fear motivation: we obey God because we love Him, we obey our boss because he will pay us, and we obey the government because we don’t want it to kill us. (Hate could also enter into any of these spheres, and I will give brief attention to its role in the economic sphere and a bit more attention to its role in the political sphere.)
Thursday, September 9, 2010 at 11:48AM (following from "Embracing the Fall")
My second big concern about Chapter 2 of Calvin and Commerce is that, to the extent that Hall and Burton want to confront and ameliorate the effects of man’s depravity in economics, their solution is one of law, rather than grace. One of the first sections in the chapter is entitled “If We Recognize Depravity, We Will Not Tolerate Non-productivity.” This language is harsh and a bit frightful. For Hall and Burton, productivity and efficiency are the highest values, and the slothful nature of man must thus be greeted with no mercy. The Calvinist doctrine of total depravity is meant to bring us all to humility, not pride, recognizing that we too are totally depraved. This thus serves as a basis for a gracious and compassionate response to the sinner (in imitation of Christ), not a stark refusal to tolerate him.