Search
Tags
academics (6) adiaphora (6) affluence (7) America (17) American culture (9) Anglicanism (8) announcements (18) Aquinas (3) architecture (6) ascension (4) asceticism (3) atonement (10) Augustine (6) authority (10) Barth (5) Bible (3) bin Laden (3) Britain (4) Bruce McCormack (10) C.S. Lewis (3) Calvin (18) Calvinism (11) Calvinist International (3) capital punishment (3) capitalism (27) Cartwright (4) cathedrals (6) Catholics (4) Chalcedon (4) charity (9) Christ (4) Christendom (4) Christian liberty (13) Christmas (4) church (30) church unity (5) climate change (5) coercion (7) conservatives (3) consumerism (4) corporations (6) creation (18) creationism (5) Croall lectures (9) cross (8) Darryl Hart (6) debt (3) dissertation (19) distributism (3) divine law (10) documentary (3) Doug Wilson (3) ecclesiastical law (4) economics (14) Election 2012 (3) Elizabethan Church (6) empire (3) environment (4) eschatology (7) ethics (5) Eucharist (4) evangelical law (4) evolution (6) fear (5) Fermentations (3) films (5) finance (3) free market (12) freedom (8) Gnosticism (3) gospel (3) government (7) Hall and Burton (5) homosexuality (6) Hooker (36) Hooker's Christology (5) housekeeping (6) human law (3) hypostatic union (5) idolatry (5) incarnation (16) inequality (3) invisible church (3) Israel (4) Jesus (22) John Locke (3) John Schneider (9) judgment (4) just war (9) justice (13) labor (4) law (24) Lent (3) LEP (7) liberalism (3) links (3) liturgy (3) love (16) Luther (9) mammon (4) marketing (4) media (7) Melanchthon (7) Mercersburg (4) modernity (3) N.T. Wright (4) natural law (25) nature/grace (8) neo-Calvinism (3) NLTK (3) Obama (4) O'Donovan (13) Old Testament law (8) pacifism (3) Paul (8) penal substitution (5) Peter Escalante (4) Peter Leithart (10) politics (24) poverty (7) prayer (7) private property (22) private property series (6) Protestantism (15) puritans (15) reason (8) rebellion (3) redemption (4) Reformation (15) Reformed (8) Republicans (5) resurrection (7) retribution (3) revelation (3) Richard Bauckham (3) Romans (10) science (9) Scripture (17) secularity (4) Sermon on the Mount (4) social justice (8) social media (3) sola scriptura (8) state (27) Steven Wedgeworth (3) tax avoidance (4) taxes (12) Tea Party (4) technology (8) theft (4) theology (5) theology of culture (3) theonomy (5) Theopolis (3) Torah (3) tradition (5) travel (3) truth (4) Twitter (3) two cities (4) two kingdoms (26) VanDrunen (19) vengeance (3) Vermigli (3) Vindiciae (3) violence (6) visible church (5) vocation (3) war (12) wealth (10) weather (4) women's ordination (3)

Entries in Tea Party (4)

Tuesday
Aug022011

The Late Great United States: A Lament

Today, August 2, 2011, the US Congress managed to agree not to send the country headlong into bankruptcy.  While we may be glad that the threat of financial Armageddon was averted for the time being, it would be an understatement to call this a Pyrrhic victory, coming as it did at the cost of the last shreds of American credibility abroad and unity at home.  Indeed, perhaps someday this day will be remembered as a symbolic milestone in the decline and fall of the American Empire.  Certainly, whether you mourn or celebrate the end of American hegemony, it is an occasion that calls for a pause for sober reflection.  

It is a perhaps clichéd now to declare that we live in the twilight days of America's world domination; indeed, I suspect that just as the 20th century is now seen as the "American Century," the verdict of history will mark 2001, the turn of the century, as the turning point, the year when the engine of American economic growth sputtered to a halt, when America sought to flex its muscles in response to external attack and gained nothing from the exercise but the hatred of former friends, when a maverick Texan president decided to take the country on a glorious John Wayne expedition against the enemies of civilization that ended up as a ride into its own sunset.

Yet it was only the events of the past couple weeks that succeeded in bringing the fact of our decline home to me--the recognition that we live at the end of an era, on the cusp of uncertain and perhaps unhappy days.

 

Click to read more ...

Friday
May132011

Taxation and Christian Ethics, Pt. 3: What is Christian Protest?

So, I've expended a great deal of metaphorical ink on attacking the idea that having a somewhat irresponsible government gives us license to avoid paying taxes.  Many people may say, "So what?  Who is this aimed at?"  Don't most people, even most Tea Party conservatives, pay their taxes, fully and on time?  No one wants to go to jail, after all.  Perhaps some do try and get creative to minimize their tax burden through loopholes, but honestly, the average working-man doesn't have time for such shenanigans.  So how is this relevant?  

Well, my parents always used to have a good principle: Obedience while grumbling and complaining is as good as disobedience.  Can we really claim to be upright citizens if we pay our taxes, but get out in the streets on April 15th to yell and carry angry signs?  If we mouth off on talk radio stations about how "oppressed" we are?  If we're supposed to pay our taxes, then aren't we supposed to pay without grumbling or complaining, without angrily protesting, without making it clear that we're paying only because we have to?   

And yet, are we supposed to be meek sheep, silently obeying whatever we are told, no matter how unjust?  Jesus may have been led like a lamb to the slaughter, but he had no qualms about calling oppressors to account in no uncertain terms.  Complete silence and passivity in the face of injustice is not a manifestation of Christian charity, because it lets ones neighbors continue to suffer.  So what is the balance here?  This is the question not merely of taxation, but of all Christian political action.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Oct142010

Love the Government, Hate the Government

I have for several months now been vexed by the irresolvable contradictions of the American political mindset.  For the first two decades of my life, I was brought up to believe that the problem with our society was that we had way too much faith in the government--the State was our Saviour, an idol to which we sacrificed all and for which we looked for every solution.  And this critique resonated deeply with me.  

For the past year, though, I have begun to wonder.  Having traveled overseas, what has struck me most about America is not how much faith we put in our government, but how little.  The rise of the Tea Party movement and the fall of Congressional approval ratings to historic lows has underscored this long-growing tendency of American politics.  We don't trust our government to do anything; we consider it not our government, but simply the government, an alien entity that forces us to obey it and pay it tribute, like an invading force.  And perhaps this should be a greater matter of concern than the State-as-idol concern.  After all, our current situation bears all the marks of the decline and fall of a great civilizations, as summarized by Carroll Quigley in his 1963 The Evolution of Civilizations (thanks to my Dad for this quote): 

"[There is] acute economic depression, declining standards of living, civil wars between the various vested interests, and growing illiteracy.  The society grows weaker and weaker.  Vain efforts are made to stop the wastage by legislation.  But the decline continues. The religious, intellectual, social, and political levels of the society begin to lose the allegiance of the masses of the people on a large scale.  New religious movements begin to sweep over the society.  There is a growing reluctance to fight for the society or even to support it by paying taxes."

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Sep282010

Delusions of a Prodigal Nation

We've all heard the news about the GOP's new "Pledge to America," which states, more or less, "We pledge allegiance to the Tea Party, and to the millions of voters for which it stands, and promise to do whatever it says."  No, it doesn't really say that, but of course, it's no secret that the Republicans are tripping over themselves to try to align themselves with, rather than against, the wave of far-right hysteria the Tea Party represents.  The basic message of this movement is to say, "No to taxes" categorically, "No to government spending" rather vaguely, and "No to deficits" as an afterthought.  Taxes, we are told, are at unacceptable levels--never mind that they are lower than they have been in decades (whereas the highest marginal tax rate under the conservative Eisenhower was 91%, now it's only 36%!).  And never mind that income inequality has shot to unprecedented levels, with the richest Americans increasing their incomes even in the midst of recession, and with the top 20% now accounting for 49.4% of all income, making it hard to see on what basis one could oppose higher marginal tax rates.  

So, we must balance the budget without increasing taxes, we are told.  This will be easy, the Pledge to America assures us, with a vague wave of its hand promising $100 billion in spending cuts by getting rid of wasteful government spending.  But that won't be enough--assuming that Congress does defy the Tea Party and let the Bush tax cuts expire for the top two income brackets, then, if we don't want to raise any more taxes, we will need $255 billion per year in spending cuts to achieve a balanced budget by 2015, which is pretty much a fiscal necessity.  How hard is it to cut $255 billion per year?  A new study by the Center for American Progress reveals the bleak answer.  

 

Click to read more ...