Search
Tags
academics (6) adiaphora (6) affluence (7) America (17) American culture (9) Anglicanism (8) announcements (18) Aquinas (3) architecture (6) ascension (4) asceticism (3) atonement (10) Augustine (6) authority (10) Barth (5) Bible (3) bin Laden (3) Britain (4) Bruce McCormack (10) C.S. Lewis (3) Calvin (18) Calvinism (11) Calvinist International (3) capital punishment (3) capitalism (27) Cartwright (4) cathedrals (6) Catholics (4) Chalcedon (4) charity (9) Christ (4) Christendom (4) Christian liberty (13) Christmas (4) church (30) church unity (5) climate change (5) coercion (7) conservatives (3) consumerism (4) corporations (6) creation (18) creationism (5) Croall lectures (9) cross (8) Darryl Hart (6) debt (3) dissertation (19) distributism (3) divine law (10) documentary (3) Doug Wilson (3) ecclesiastical law (4) economics (14) Election 2012 (3) Elizabethan Church (6) empire (3) environment (4) eschatology (7) ethics (5) Eucharist (4) evangelical law (4) evolution (6) fear (5) Fermentations (3) films (5) finance (3) free market (12) freedom (8) Gnosticism (3) gospel (3) government (7) Hall and Burton (5) homosexuality (6) Hooker (36) Hooker's Christology (5) housekeeping (6) human law (3) hypostatic union (5) idolatry (5) incarnation (16) inequality (3) invisible church (3) Israel (4) Jesus (22) John Locke (3) John Schneider (9) judgment (4) just war (9) justice (13) labor (4) law (24) Lent (3) LEP (7) liberalism (3) links (3) liturgy (3) love (16) Luther (9) mammon (4) marketing (4) media (7) Melanchthon (7) Mercersburg (4) modernity (3) N.T. Wright (4) natural law (25) nature/grace (8) neo-Calvinism (3) NLTK (3) Obama (4) O'Donovan (13) Old Testament law (8) pacifism (3) Paul (8) penal substitution (5) Peter Escalante (4) Peter Leithart (10) politics (24) poverty (7) prayer (7) private property (22) private property series (6) Protestantism (15) puritans (15) reason (8) rebellion (3) redemption (4) Reformation (15) Reformed (8) Republicans (5) resurrection (7) retribution (3) revelation (3) Richard Bauckham (3) Romans (10) science (9) Scripture (17) secularity (4) Sermon on the Mount (4) social justice (8) social media (3) sola scriptura (8) state (27) Steven Wedgeworth (3) tax avoidance (4) taxes (12) Tea Party (4) technology (8) theft (4) theology (5) theology of culture (3) theonomy (5) Theopolis (3) Torah (3) tradition (5) travel (3) truth (4) Twitter (3) two cities (4) two kingdoms (26) VanDrunen (19) vengeance (3) Vermigli (3) Vindiciae (3) violence (6) visible church (5) vocation (3) war (12) wealth (10) weather (4) women's ordination (3)

Entries in vengeance (3)

Saturday
Dec312011

Identity Founded on Recrimination

As we come to the end of 2011, the year that marks a decade since the events of September 11th, a decade of war, polarization, and obsessive vengeance that still has no clear end in sight, this sombre reflection from Oliver O'Donovan which I came across this morning seems very appropriate:

(from a sermon given on September 15, 2002, after the first annual commemoration of 9/11)

"The practice of public commemoration which our Christian forebears left us was, in its way, a spiritually disciplined one.  Commemorations were built around mercies received from God, occasions of thanksgiving for deliverance.  So the two world wars were remembered on the exact anniversary of the signing of the armistice in 1918, a day of deliverance from war.  I can think of no precedent for solemn ceremonies to mark the very moment when an abomination was committed.  For times of grave affliction, when there was nothing concrete to be thankful for, the older practice prescribed public fasting, which ensured that the first response to crisis would be critical self-examination.  Our Christian forebears knew well enough that public acts fashioned identity.  They also knew, I think, that identities founded on recrimination were always in want of an emeny, and that to be in want of an enemy was to be sure of finding one.

Last week we did that unprecedented thing.  We seized on an abomination and made it a symbol of our posture in the world.  We committed ourselves to an alliance of power built on resentment of one isolated and — for all the horror of that moment — ineffective blow. . . an alliance [that] presented itself to the world in the guise of an injured victim demanding vengeance.  I find it hard to imagine where this illusory self-understanding will ever lead us, other than to deeds of great wickedness."

Sunday
Dec042011

Justice Against the Oppressor--What to do with Imprecatory Psalms

Another gem of a passage from Bauckham's The Bible in Politics, offering perhaps the most satisfactory discussion of the issue of imprecatory psalms and forgiving enemies that I have yet read:

"The oppressed Christian who discovers Jesus' solidarity with him must take account of one respect in which Jesus in his suffering prayed differently from the way the psalmists prayed.  Jesus prayed for his enemies' forgiveness (Luke 23:34), thus practising his own teaching (Matt. 5:44).  The psalmists never did this: their attitude to their enemies is consistently unforgiving.  They pray for God's judgement on their enemies (Ps. 10:2b, 15), sometimes in the form of solemn and extensive curses (Ps. 69:22-8; 109:6-20).  But such prayers are not unknown in the New Testament (Rev. 6:10).  They need to be accorded a kind of provisional validity, which does not excuse any Christian from the duty of forgiving enemies, but does help us to understand what is really involved in forgiveness.  Jesus' demand for forgiveness of enemies does not, we might say, simply revoke these prayers, but takes a step further beyond them.  We have to appreciate what is valid about them before we can rightly take, as followers of Jesus must take, that further step.  

Click to read more ...

Friday
Oct292010

Praying for the Conversion of our Enemies

Awhile ago, there was something of a debate on here as to whether it was legitimate for Christians to desire the destruction of their enemies.  I argued--not being an outright pacifist--that, although it might be legitimate in certain cases to take action to kill enemies, it would never be legitimate to rejoice in that action; we might have to destroy our enemies in rare cases, but we should never desire their destruction.  Various Biblical counterexamples were alleged against my position, and it was suggested that perhaps the difference between my interlocutor and I was that his position was logically a pure Calvinist position, whereas I tended to qualify my Calvinism with a heavy dose of Barthianism.  

So I was intrigued today to come across, in Calvin's commentary on Romans 12:14-21, a resounding and powerful statement of the need for Christians always to desire the good and the salvation of their enemies--not only not to take vengeance, but not to desire that vengeance be taken:

“In this passage, Paul requires a train of conduct yet more difficult, not to pray for evil and curses to light on the heads of our enemies, but to wish them every kind of prosperity, and supplicate God to grant them every blessing, however much they may harass, and treat us with the most barbarous inhumanity.  We ought to labour after the attainment of this mildness with the more intense diligence, in proportion to the difficulty of its attainment...."

Click to read more ...